If your legal team is working on a malpractice lawsuit due to complications in the treatment of nerve disorders, you’re going to need the services of a neurology expert before you can proceed. Reliable Clinical Experts can assist you with neurology expert witness services that will put you in the best position for success.
All our medical expert witnesses are:
Board certified. We’ll assign you an expert who has been educated at one of the world’s top universities.
Actively practicing nationwide and in Puerto Rico. Your neurology witness is a professional with years of experience in the medical field.
Prescreened. Our experts are highly skilled at translating complex medical terminology into language that a layperson can understand.
Reliable Clinical Experts has more than 30 years of experience contributing valuable information and guidance to legal teams so they can get their clients the compensation they deserve.
There’s no need to wait any longer for expert analysis than you have to. That’s why we have a 3-step process to obtain consultation and turnaround in 24 hours. You’ll receive:
Neuroradiologist Expert Witnesses are medical doctors, or other professionals who have experience with Neuroradiology. Neuroradiology is the field of Radiology that deals with the study, diagnosis and treatment of disorders affecting the brain, spine or nerves.
Neuroradiologists are experts in Neuroradiology; they understand various techniques used to diagnose conditions such as tumors, aneurysms, traumatic injuries and other maladies related to Neuroradiology. This is why Neuroradiologist Expert Witnesses are so valuable for lawsuits involving issues related to Neuroradiolgy.
It’s possible you’ll need a Neuroradiology expert witness if there was negligence on behalf of your doctor or medical facility when treating some type of neurological condition. You might also have grounds for legal action if one of these professionals failed at diagnosing something significant. Neuroradiology expert witnesses can also be helpful if you’re seeking a second opinion for an MRI or CT scan interpretation.
Some common examples of lawsuits where a Neuroradiologist Expert Witness could provide valuable testimony include:
– Medical malpractice cases involving neurological injuries or conditions
– A wrongful death lawsuit that is the result of a neurological injury or condition
– Cases in which incorrect diagnosis played a part in significant health problems or death
– Disputes over insurance coverage for treatments related to Neuroradiology. For example, whether an MRI should be considered “medically necessary” and thus covered by insurance.
Neuroradiologist Expert Witnesses can be helpful in a variety of legal cases, and often work in conjunction with expert witnesses from other fields to provide the most complete testimony possible. If you think you might need a Neuroradiologist Expert Witness, be sure to consult with an attorney who is familiar with these types of cases.
If you’re dealing with a legal issue related to Neuroradiology, it’s important to get the right expert testimony on your side. A Neuroradiology Expert Witness can provide valuable insight and help prove negligence or wrongdoing by medical professionals.
Medical experts have an ethical responsibility to take part in legal disputes involving malpractice and other medical wrongdoing. This can be an incredibly rewarding experience for expert medical witnesses, giving them an opportunity to aid the pursuit of justice and public safety. Being an expert witness can be risky, because you need to understand and apply specific guidelines and qualifications along with being aware of the difference between the legal system and clinical practice. Here are a couple of key facts about what being a professional neurology expert witness in court is like.
As part of the medical legal consulting panel, a neurologist has special training and experience in assessing, diagnosing, and treating nervous system disorders. This gives you the ability to explain complicated neuroscientific evidence to judges and juries. Usually, a neurologist is asked to be an expert witness by an attorney. Attorneys for the defendant and plaintiff will ask the neurologist questions in order to establish or discredit their expertise, reliability, or objectivity, and clarify or obscure any clinical neuroscientific evidence. Neurology expert witnesses should know that their testimony is subject to peer review.
There are 4 main ways a neurologist participates in a court case. You can be called on as a fact witness, testifying about the care you gave a defendant, as a non-witness to give attorneys advice about how strong their neuroscientific evidence is, as a party to an amicus curiae who provides a written academic opinion on a case, or as an expert witness who testifies about current standards of practice, appropriate care of patients, or competence of a physician.
When you are evaluating evidence, there are key differences in the methodologies of a courtroom and a clinical setting that neurologists acting as medical expert witnesses need to be aware of. This is due to the different purposes of law and medicine and the varying ways they pursue the truth. Medicine uses scientific knowledge related to health and disease to find ways to heal people who are sick, while the law seeks to solve disputes according to standards and rules that stem from legislation or past judicial decisions. Medicine seeks the truth using an empirical process where hypotheses are rigorously tested over time, while the law seeks truth by supporting two opposing teams representing competing interests.
These differences have a significant impact on your experience as a neurology expert witness in the courtroom. The traditional ways that an expert clinician would gather and assess evidence don’t translate as smoothly to the courtroom. This can cause an expert medical witness to veer off course of the professional guidelines they are supposed to follow during their testimony.
A neurologist faces several dilemmas as an expert witness in court. To start, under oath, their main job is to answer questions by attorneys on both sides as truthfully as they can. While under oath, they are not allowed to ask questions, though they can request clarification on any questions that aren’t clear. Next, they must remain neutral and objective, which can conflict with their drive to serve a patient’s interests. Lastly, what the court and clinics consider viable evidence can differ. There are strict rules of evidence that establish what evidence is admissible in court. Lastly, the law and medicine use different processes to make decisions when there is uncertainty. While medicine uses diagnoses based on statistics, the law uses a broader range and context to resolve uncertainties in a case.
At Reliable Clinical Experts, we specialize in providing experienced, professional expert witnesses that will provide the necessary information and expertise in order to present the best case. Contact us today for more information.
Don’t waste your trial funds on a consultation with a high initial case review rate just to find no evidence of medical negligence. Let Reliable Clinical Experts closely examine the merit of your case for a low-cost consultation. Schedule an appointment with our medical experts today. Learn more about how we can help with your legal issues by giving us a call.(855) 608-2025 Free consultation